MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062606821 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0257

From Drawing to Visual Culture: A History of Art Education in Canada (review)

2008· article· en· W2062606821 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
jan jagodzinski

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisual arts educationPeriod (music)Visual culturePostmodernismContemporary artPoliticsSubject (documents)Art historyCriticismHistory of artArt criticismArtHistorySociologyVisual artsAestheticsLawPolitical sciencePerformance artLiteratureLibrary scienceThe arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: From Drawing to Visual Culture: A History of Art Education in Canada Jan Jagodzinski Harold Pearse, editor. From Drawing to Visual Culture: A History of Art Education in Canada. McGill-Queen's University Press. vii, 304, $80.00 Harold Pearse, well-known Canadian art educator, artist, and past president of the Canadian Society of Art Education, has managed a labour of love over the past ten years by bringing together a collection of essays that effectively lay the groundwork for a history of art education in Canada. In the introduction Pearse provides a lay of the land, anchoring his history in a number of definable periods that take us from early vocational drawing, which lasted until the turn of the twentieth century, through the next thirty years under the influence of Walter Smith, toward the introduction of visual art as its supplement, leading up to the era of child art as influenced by the charismatic figure of Arthur Lismer. The modern period (postwar period to the 1980s) of school-based art education was consolidated by the tireless work of Ontario's director of art C.D. Gaitskell, whose efforts grounded the Canadian Society for Education through Art in 1955. Influenced by artists, art criticism, and art history, this period saw the growth of art in schools across the provinces and the establishment of museum education. Pearse ends his overview with the late and postmodern era by pointing to the political need to advocate art education as a compulsory subject. He ends by describing its current state of hybridity, culminating in what many take to be a need for art education to move into 'visual culture.' Despite the lack of a national art education program, Pearse manages to treat all provinces fairly, interweaving a complex rhizomatic narrative of intertwining details and names that provide a rich tapestry of connections and details that only someone with over thirty years of experience and knowledge of the Canadian art context could have done. The nine essays follow the timeline of the introduction. The first three essays examine in detail the significance of mechanical drawing in nineteenth-century Canada with the rise of vocational education. Graeme Chalmers's essay provides a detailed account of the Mechanics' Institute in Barrie, Ontario, in the 1850s as a generic model of adult education at the time, followed by back-to-back essays by Craig Stirling who continues the narrative by looking at these developments in Quebec and then Ontario from 1870s to the 1920s. [End Page 134] Both authors make us aware of the religious and political ideology that lay behind such vocational training, especially the British influence of Henry Cole's South Kensington system of vocational drawing, which had made Great Britain a leader in industrial design. Harold Pease follows with an essay that brings the history into the twentieth century, when mechanical drawing is supplemented with art mostly along gendered lines though the influences of 'picture study' (as a form of cultural cultivation) and 'child art.' Pease examines these developments in three provinces (Nova Scotia, Ontario, and British Columbia) by focusing on key figures: Alexander McKay, Jessie P. Semple, and Winifred Gabriel, respectively. Suzanne Lemersie and Leah Sherman provide an account of how 'child art' became associated with modern art, especially in Quebec in the 1920s. They provide the history of the turn away from mechanical drawing to art education proper as influenced especially by Arthur Lismer. With this background it becomes possible to see how the Arts and Crafts Movement and the cultivation of art for moral and democratic citizenship could be used for ideological ends. Lisa Panayotidis does a remarkable job of demonstrating this in the context of the social reconstruction that took place in the pre- and postwar era. Wendy Stephenson follows with a detailed examination of Kitsilano Junior/Senior High School, charting its art curricular developments from the 1920s up to the 1950s. The last two essays bring us to the new millennium. Roger Clark's biting and often ironic essay gives us an insight as to why Ontario's full potential to become a leader in graduate art education was not realized, despite its solid historical foundation established by...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicArt Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207