MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062624870 · doi:10.1190/1.3555323

Inversion of time-lapse electrical resistivity imaging data for monitoring infiltration

2011· article· en· W2062624870 on OpenAlexaff
V. Mitchell, Rosemary Knight, Adam Pidlisecky

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVadose zoneElectrical resistivity tomographyInfiltration (HVAC)AquiferGroundwaterElectrical resistivity and conductivityGeologySoil scienceSaturation (graph theory)Hydraulic conductivityInversion (geology)Environmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Soil waterGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Monitoring hydrologic processes in the vadose zone is of great importance in developing management strategies for groundwater resources. Flow and transport behavior in variably saturated media control the rate at which, and path along which, fluids or contaminants reach groundwater aquifers. Electrical resistivity imaging (ERI) is sensitive to changes in the subsurface conductivity structure, which is highly dependent on the water saturation distribution in the vadose zone. Time-lapse ERI, therefore, has been widely used for environmental and hydrologic monitoring experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Leading EdgeSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207