Calpain Mutants with Increased Ca2+ Sensitivity and Implications for the Role of the C2-like Domain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ubiquitous calpain isoforms (mu- and m-calpain) are Ca(2+)-dependent cysteine proteases that require surprisingly high Ca(2+) concentrations for activation in vitro ( approximately 50 and approximately 300 microm, respectively). The molecular basis of such a high requirement for Ca(2+) in vitro is not known. In this study, we substantially reduced the concentration of Ca(2+) required for the activation of m-calpain in vitro through the specific disruption of interdomain interactions by structure-guided site-directed mutagenesis. Several interdomain electrostatic interactions involving lysine residues in domain II and acidic residues in the C(2)-like domain III were disrupted, and the effects of these mutations on activity and Ca(2+) sensitivity were analyzed. The mutation to serine of Glu-504, a residue that is conserved in both mu- and m-calpain and interacts most notably with Lys-234, reduced the in vitro Ca(2+) requirement for activity by almost 50%. The mutation of Lys-234 to serine or glutamic acid resulted in a similar reduction. These are the first reported cases in which point mutations have been able to reduce the Ca(2+) requirement of calpain. The structures of the mutants in the absence of Ca(2+) were shown by x-ray crystallography to be unchanged from the wild type, demonstrating that the increase in Ca(2+) sensitivity was not attributable to conformational change prior to activation. The conservation of sequence between mu-calpain, m-calpain, and calpain 3 in this region suggests that the results can be extended to all of these isoforms. Whereas the primary Ca(2+) binding is assumed to occur at EF-hands in domains IV and VI, these results show that domain II-domain III salt bridges are important in the process of the Ca(2+)-induced activation of calpain and that they influence the overall Ca(2+) requirement of the enzyme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".