Fluorescence quenching of phenanthrene and anthracene by maleic anhydride and <i>n</i>‐octadecenylsuccinic anhydride in solution and in bulk polypropylene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fluorescence quenching of phenanthrene (Ph) and anthracene (An) fluorophores by maleic anhydride (MAH) and n‐octadecenylsuccinic anhydride (ODSA) quenchers in solid polypropylene (PP) films were studied. Results were compared with fluorescence quenching of the same fluorophores by MAH and ODSA quenchers in chloroform solution. Contrary to the results obtained in solution, it was observed that fluorescence emission of Ph fluorophore in PP films was more efficiently quenched by ODSA than by MAH. This was due to the better miscibility of Ph with ODSA than with MAH. When An fluorophore was used instead of Ph, it was observed that its fluorescence intensity in PP films was notably reduced by the addition of MAH. This was mainly due to the Diels–Alder reaction, which consumed a part of the An molecule. However, fluorescence intensity of An strangely increased with the addition of ODSA instead of MAH. Because of short lifetime of An (around 6 ns), ODSA had no quenching effect on An. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:192–199, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".