MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062663143 · doi:10.1093/cid/civ197

Hepatitis C Virus Therapeutic Development: In Pursuit of "Perfectovir"

2015· review· en· W2062663143 on OpenAlexaff
Gregory J. Dore, Jordan J. Feld

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsToronto Liver CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePublic healthHepatitis C virusIntensive care medicineDrug pricingHepatitis CDisease burdenPrioritizationDiseaseGlobal healthImmunologyVirusInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The next decade will be a crucial period in the public health response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The rapid development of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for HCV infection has brought considerable optimism to the HCV sector, with the realistic hope that therapeutic intervention will soon provide near-optimal efficacy with well-tolerated short-duration, all-oral regimens. As the zenith in HCV therapeutic development approaches, there remain several key obstacles to the broad implementation of interferon-free DAA regimens. The extent of HCV screening and disease assessment, global and national public health prioritization, and drug pricing will determine the potential impact on disease burden derived from introduction of these exciting new HCV therapies. Public health partnerships and advocacy will be crucial to remove barriers to enhanced HCV treatment access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.227
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations142
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infectious DiseasesSame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207