MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062673144 · doi:10.2118/77724-ms

A Novel Approach for Incorporating Physical Dispersion in Miscible Displacement

2002· article· en· W2062673144 on OpenAlex
Vijay Shrivastava, Long X. Nghiem, R.G. Moore

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDispersion (optics)MechanicsGridConvectionMathematical optimizationComputer scienceApplied mathematicsGeologyMathematicsPhysicsGeometryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Physical dispersion is one of the main mechanisms responsible for controlling the gas-oil mixing that occurs in a miscible flood process. Many conventional reservoir simulators do not explicitly account for the physical dispersion and presume that it may be compensated by numerical dispersion arising out of the finite difference scheme with single point upstream weighting of mobilities for the reservoir grid block sizes used in field-scale simulations. This assumption may lead to erroneous results. The multi-point flux approximation (MPFA) schemes developed in recent years provide improved treatment of the convective flux and allow the handling of tensorial permeabilities for non-uniform and skewed grids. These grids are often required for proper representation of the reservoir geometry. The physical dispersion coefficient in the dispersive flux is tensorial in nature and amenable to a treatment similar to the permeability in the convective flux. We have applied a multipoint control-volume method together with a total variation diminishing (TVD) scheme to calculating the dispersive flux in a compositional simulator. The TVD scheme was used to minimize the effect of front smearing caused by numerical dispersion. This paper presents a method for calculating the full physical dispersion tensor in a compositional simulator using corner-point grids. The proposed formulation accurately handles dispersive flux for non-orthogonal grids, and along with the TVD scheme provides a means for distinguishing physical dispersion from numerical dispersion. A number of cases are presented to show the improvements in simulation results that could be obtained with the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it