The addition of sociotropy to the dual pathway model of bulimia.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le modele de voie double de la boulimie propose que les pressions sociales interiorisees conduisent a une insatisfaction corporelle autopercue. Par ricochet, on pense que l'insatisfaction corporelle est liee a des restrictions alimentaires et a l'affect negatif qui influencent l'apparition de la boulimie. Dans le cadre d'un elargissement du modele de voie double de la boulimie, cette etude fait appel au besoin d'approbation et de la peur du rejet social (appelee sociotropie) dans le modele. Des questionnaires mesurant le modele de voie double et la sociotropie ont ete remplis par 184 etudiantes de premier cycle et un modele theorique propose a ete mis a l'essai a l'aide d'une modelisation d'equation structurelle. Les conclusions viennent a l'appui de plusieurs aspects de modele a voie double de la boulimie et l'ajout de la sociotopie semble renforcer les predictions de comportement boulimique du modele.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".