Luteinized Thecomas (Thecomatosis) of the Type Typically Associated With Sclerosing Peritonitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nature of the distinctive ovarian lesion often associated with sclerosing peritonitis, initially considered a variant of luteinized thecoma in the paper describing this phenomenon, remains uncertain, as does its long-term prognosis. We describe the features of 27 cases, including immunohistochemical analysis of 13 cases. Sclerosing peritonitis was documented in 25 cases. Patients ranged in age from 10 months to 85 years, and typically presented with abdominal distension and pain with ascites and sometimes bowel obstruction. The ovarian lesions, clinically bilateral in 24 cases, ranged from 2 to 31 cm and often had a striking cerebriform aspect. Microscopically, mitotically active spindle cells with weakly luteinized cells, variable edema, and entrapped follicles were typical. The spindle cells were focally positive with calretinin in 2 cases, CD56 in 2, AE1/3 in 4, smooth muscle actin in 12, and desmin in 8 cases, and negative with alpha-inhibin, epithelial membrane antigen, beta-catenin, CD34, and transforming growth factor-beta, with focal nuclear positivity for estrogen receptor in 5 and progesterone receptor in 11 cases. Luteinized cells were positive with alpha-inhibin, calretinin, and/or CD56. The peritoneal lesions were strongly positive with AE1/3 and exhibited focal weak or moderate positivity with estrogen receptor or progesterone receptor in 4 of 8 cases each. Follow-up in 20 cases (mean: 5.9 y) disclosed no evidence of spread of the ovarian lesion, but 3 patients died of sclerosing peritonitis. The findings fail to allow definitive classification of the ovarian lesions, and we prefer at present to retain their current designation as a subtype of luteinized thecoma, but to allow for the possibility of a non-neoplastic nature, feel it reasonable to have the designation "thecomatosis" as a parenthetical alternative. We have documented for the first time that sclerosing peritonitis is not invariably associated with the distinctive ovarian pathology present in these cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".