MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062701059 · doi:10.1080/01919510903468029

Treatability Study on Membrane Concentrate Containing Pesticides Using Advanced Oxidation Processes

2010· article· en· W2062701059 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOzone Science and Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced oxidation water treatment
Canadian institutionsCanadian Natural ResourcesUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsPesticideTrifluralinHydrogen peroxideBromoxynilChemistryOzonePesticide degradationAdvanced oxidation processEnvironmental chemistryOxidation processDegradation (telecommunications)MembranePulp and paper industryOrganic chemistryCatalysisChemical controlComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This treatability study evaluated the overall effectiveness of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) to treat membrane concentrates containing the pesticides bromoxynil and trifluralin. The results of study indicate that high levels of pesticide degradation were achieved using ozone (O3) plus hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for all concentrate matrices. However, the toxicity of the samples during the O3/H2O2 process was higher than that obtained during ultraviolet (UV) light combined with H2O2. Low levels of pesticide oxidation were observed in experiments using a mixture of pesticides during all treatment options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it