MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062742330 · doi:10.1021/ma0482359

In-Situ Hot Stage Atomic Force Microscopy Study of Poly(<b>ε</b>-caprolactone) Crystal Growth in Ultrathin Films

2004· article· en· W2062742330 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent H. Mareau, Robert E. Prud’homme

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer crystallization and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLamellar structureMaterials scienceCrystallizationCrystallographySpherulite (polymer physics)Crystal (programming language)Crystal growthSupercoolingIsothermal processSubstrate (aquarium)Composite materialPolymerChemical engineeringChemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Morphologies, growth rates, and melting of isothermally crystallized ultrathin (200−1 nm) poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) films have been investigated in real time by atomic force microscopy. The flat-on orientation of the lamellar crystals relative to the substrate was determined by electron diffraction. The truncated lozenge-shaped PCL crystals observed at low undercooling become distorted for films of thicknesses equal to or thinner than the lamellar thickness, which depends on the crystallization temperature but not on the initial film thickness. The melting behavior of distorted crystals differs from that of undistorted ones, and their growth is slower and nonlinear. The crystal growth rate decreases greatly with the film thickness. All these observations are discussed in terms of the diffusion of the polymer chains from the melt to the crystal growth front.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations190
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicPolymer crystallization and propertiesFrench-language works237,207