Nanostructure and sp1/sp2 clustering in tetrahedral amorphous carbon thin films grown by femtosecond laser deposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diamondlike amorphous carbon films have been deposited on silicon and quartz substrates by laser ablation of graphite using 120 fs pulses from an amplified Ti:sapphire laser operating at 800 nm. Ultraviolet/visible (UV/VIS) and micro-Raman spectra of these materials have shown that the sp3-bonded carbon fraction in these films is ≈27%, 55%, and 20% when deposition occurs at substrate temperatures of 77, 300, and 573 K, respectively. The presence of sp1 chains in these films is indicated by the appearance of an excitation band at 2000–2100 cm−1 in UV-Raman spectra. We also find a remarkable increase in the Tauc energy gap calculated from in situ UV/VIS optical spectra immediately after exposure to air together with a 1 eV redshift of the C 1s core-level energy in x-ray photoelectron spectra of these samples. The properties of sp1-, sp2- and sp3-bonded components of these materials have also been studied using UV/VIS Raman spectroscopy. The enhanced stability of sp1 chains in tetrahedral carbon matrix is discussed. The present study sheds light on novel tetrahedral carbon materials embedded with both sp1 chains and sp2 clusters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".