Subjective Visual Vertical Tilt Attraction to the Side of Rod Presentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of initial rod position on the subjective visual vertical (SVV) tilt and to investigate the effect of sex and age on the SVV tilt induced by this initial position. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: The study included 6598 consecutive patients with a large range of vestibular disorders and 333 control subjects. The mean age was 55 years (range, 3-97), and the sex ratio was 0.6. INTERVENTION: SVV was measured by presenting a phosphorescent rod 12 times in total darkness with a 45-degree deviation from the vertical alternatively on the right and left. The patient was asked to replace the bar vertically with a remote control. RESULTS: On average, SVV at each iteration was tilted to the side of the rod presentation. It was stronger in female subjects, in younger individuals (<20 years) and seniors (>50). It was also higher in patients with a left vestibular loss in comparison to those with a right involvement. CONCLUSIONS: These effects suggest that short-term visual memory and multisensory cortical processing interfere with SVV measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".