MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062784859 · doi:10.1109/noms.2014.6838241

Design and management of DOT: A Distributed OpenFlow Testbed

2014· article· en· W2062784859 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpenFlowTestbedComputer scienceSoftware-defined networkingScalabilityNetwork topologyComputer networkDistributed computingWorkloadOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the growing adoption of Software Defined Networking (SDN), there is a compelling need for SDN emulators that facilitate experimenting with new SDN-based technologies. Unfortunately, Mininet [1], the de facto standard emulator for software defined networks, fails to scale with network size and traffic volume. The aim of this paper is to fill the void in this space by presenting a low cost and scalable network emulator called Distributed OpenFlow Testbed (DOT). It can emulate large SDN deployments by distributing the workload over a cluster of compute nodes. Through extensive experiments, we show that DOT can overcome the limitations of Mininet and emulate larger networks. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of DOT on four Rocketfuel topologies. DOT is available for public use and community-driven development at dothub.org.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207