MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062786149 · doi:10.1109/milcom.2011.6127452

Enhancement of frequency-based wormhole attack detection

2011· article· en· W2062786149 on OpenAlexaff
Ronggong Song, Peter C. Mason, Ming Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWormholeTestbedComputer networkMobile ad hoc networkFrequency domainNode (physics)Global Positioning SystemFast Fourier transformSIGNAL (programming language)Real-time computingEmbedded systemAlgorithmTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) have been seen as a key tactical communication technology. However, one of the most severe attacks in MANETs, the wormhole attack remains a sizable challenge. Most existing wormhole detection techniques rely on specialized hardware such as directional antennas, GPS, or high precision clocks, which can limit their efficacy. In order to provide an efficient and accurate detection mechanism for wormhole attacks, we present a new method based on signal processing techniques, in which purposely shaped traffic is transmitted, analysed at the destination node by constructing the reception time data into a “signal”, and then transforming this signal to the frequency domain using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). Using this technique, the wormhole attack can be quickly and accurately identified. We demonstrate in simulation and in a testbed that the proposed methodology can be used to detect an attack within seconds. In addition, the detection mechanism proposed is agnostic of routing protocol and does not require any specialized hardware support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207