Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors of childhood: diagnosis, treatment and challenges
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor of the brain was described as a unique entity in the late 1980s. It occurs primarily in early childhood but the true incidence of the disease is not yet known. At presentation, the differential diagnosis includes medulloblastoma, primitive neuroectodermal tumor, ependymoma and choroid plexus carcinoma. Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor behaves in a very aggressive manner and while cure is possible for a small minority of patients, no standard or effective therapy has been defined for most patients. Since its first description, considerable pathologic, cytogenetic and molecular characterizations, as described in this review, have been accomplished that provide insight into the possible molecular etiology of the disease and of malignant rhabdoid tumors that occur outside the CNS. Co-operative group clinical trials that focus solely on atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor are needed that incorporate biologic studies along with evaluations of aggressive treatment approaches. The goal of these trials should be to increase the cure rate for children with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor and further increase our understanding not only of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor, but also of other pediatric brain tumors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it