MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062812898 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.205116

Light transport in photonic crystals composed of magneto-optically active materials

2005· article· en· W2062812898 on OpenAlexafffund
Antonio García‐Martín, G. Armelles, Suresh Pereira

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad
KeywordsFaraday effectDielectricCondensed matter physicsMagnetic fieldMaterials sciencePolarization (electrochemistry)ScatteringLight scatteringOptical isolatorPhotonic crystalOpticsFaraday cagePhotonicsRayPhysicsOptoelectronicsOptical fiberQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze the properties of light propagation through ordered structures made of metallic wires (or disks) embedded in a dielectric medium in the presence of a magnetic field. The magnetic field not only modifies the polarization properties of the transmitted and reflected light, but it also induces absorption channels that give rise to well-defined structures in the transmission spectrum and in the Faraday rotation. Interaction and size effects are also analyzed. To perform the numerical simulations we extend an existing scattering matrix method to deal with the off-diagonal terms of the dielectric tensor required for the proper treatment of magneto-optical activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207