Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recent advances in ovulation induction. RECENT FINDINGS: Aromatase inhibitors can replace clomiphene citrate as ovulation-inducing substances. The most widely used aromatase inhibitor for this purpose is letrozole and the optimal dose is 5 mg daily for 5 days. Compared to clomiphene citrate, it is associated with a thicker endometrium and a better pregnancy rate. It is as effective as gonadotropin but yet less expensive. The overall rates of congenital malformation among newborns conceived after infertility treatment with letrozole or clomiphene citrate are similar. When letrozole is combined with gonadotropin, it leads to lower gonadotropin requirements with pregnancy rates comparable to gonadotropin treatment alone. Another promising aromatase inhibitor is anastrazole. Recent evidence suggests that luteinizing hormone activity in human menopausal gonadotropin modifies follicular development so that fewer intermediate-sized follicles develop. Compared to the use of follicular stimulating hormone only, human menopausal gonadotropin is associated with less ovarian hyperstimulation. SUMMARY: Aromatase inhibitors are alternative drugs to clomiphene or gonadotropin for ovulation induction or superovulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".