Tectonic block motion and glacial isostatic adjustment in southeast Alaska and adjacent Canada constrained by GPS measurements
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We use data from campaign and continuous GPS sites in southeast Alaska and the neighboring region of Canada to constrain a regional tectonic block model that estimates block angular velocities and derives a self‐consistent set of fault slip rates from the block motions. Present‐day tectonics in southeast Alaska is strongly influenced by the collision of the Yakutat block. Our model predicts a velocity of 50.3 ± 0.8 mm/a toward N22.9 ± 0.6° W for that block. Our results suggest that the eastern edge of the Yakutat block is deforming. Along this edge, the Fairweather fault accommodates a large portion of the Pacific‐North America relative plate motion through 42.9 ± 0.9 mm/a of dextral slip. Further south along the Queen Charlotte fault, our model predicts an average of 43.9 ± 0.6 mm/a of dextral slip and a southward increasing amount of transpression. Strain from the Yakutat collision is transferred far to the east of the strike‐slip system. This strain transfer causes the region north of Glacier Bay to undergo a clockwise rotation. South of Glacier Bay and inboard of the Queen Charlotte fault, a smaller but clearly defined clockwise rotation is observed. The heterogeneous block motion north and south of Glacier Bay may indicate the area is undergoing internal deformation and could explain regional patterns of diffuse seismicity. The Northern Cordillera of Canada displays a small northeasterly motion. Our block model suggests that the entire southeastern Alaska‐northwestern Canada margin is mobile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it