MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062865089 · doi:10.2118/120642-ms

Production Optimization and Uncertainty Assessment in a CO2 Flooding Reservoir

2009· article· en· W2062865089 on OpenAlexafffund
Shengnan Chen, Heng Li, Daoyong Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Production and Operations Symposium · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsPetroleum Technology Research CentreUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPetroleum Technology Research Centre
KeywordsInjectorPetroleum engineeringEnhanced oil recoveryInjection wellWater injection (oil production)InflowResidual oilProduction (economics)Range (aeronautics)Oil fieldNet present valueReservoir simulationEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringGeologyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The main objective of modern reservoir management is to maximize the oil recovery when a displacing agent, such as CO2, is injected to displace the residual oil in a reservoir. Such process can be controlled properly by allocating the injected fluids to the injectors and adjusting the produced fluids from the producers. Inappropriate production-injection strategy leads to early breakthrough, unstable pressure distribution, and low ultimate oil recovery. Furthermore, presence of physical and/or financial uncertainties elevates the complexity of the field production optimization. In this paper, a pragmatic technique has been developed and successfully applied to determine the optimum production-injection strategy in a CO2 flooding reservoir by incorporating well performance into reservoir simulation in the presence of both physical and financial uncertainties. More specifically, well rates of the injectors and flowing bottomhole pressures of the producers are chosen as the controlling variables. Several variable candidates are first assessed, determined and finally assigned to each well based on the inflow performance curve, multiphase flow behavior in the wellbore, and voidage balance within the reservoir. An objective function associated with both the average net present value (NPV) and the range of NPV uncertainty is then defined, while a modified genetic algorithm is utilized as optimization engine to determine the optimum production-injection strategy. In addition, multiple equal-probable reservoir models are used to account for the physical uncertainty, while prices of oil and CO2 are applied to assess and quantify the financial uncertainty. Compared to the production-injection strategies without optimization, it is shown from a field case that the optimum strategy can postpone the CO2 breakthrough time by 1.5 years, decrease the water cut by 8.4%, and increase the oil recovery and net present value by 7.8% and 6.6%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Production and Operations SymposiumSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207