Study of hadrons emission in 4.5<i>A</i> GeV/<i>c</i><sup>32</sup>Sinteractions with emulsion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An experimental study of the forward and backward emission of relativistic and fast hadrons in the interactions of 4.5 A,GeV/c 32S with emulsion was carried out. The study supports the conclusion that a collective mechanism is responsible for the production of particles in the backward hemisphere (which is restricted beyond the kinematics limit). The backward emission of both shower and grey particles can be described by an exponential decay law independent of the projectile size. The experimental results suggest that the backward particles result from the decay of the system in a latter stage of the interaction. While the average multiplicities of the shower particles emitted in the forward hemisphere are strongly dependent on the projectile size and incident momentum, the average values of those emitted into the backward hemisphere are found to be only a function of the target size (i.e., impact parameter). Thus, the backward particle production can be considered as a yield of a highly excited target system, in its rest frame.PACS Nos.: 25.75.–q, 25.75.Dw, 25.75.Gz, 25.75.Ld, 25.70.Mn, 25.70.Pq,41.75.Ak, 41.75.Cn, 29.40.Rg, 07.68.+m
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".