MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062882032 · doi:10.1091/mbc.e08-11-1138

LKB1 Catalytic Activity Contributes to Estrogen Receptor α Signaling

2009· article· en· W2062882032 on OpenAlexafffund
Suchita Nath-Sain, Paola A. Marignani

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Biology of the Cell · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDalhousie UniversityCure Brain Cancer FoundationNova Scotia Health Research Foundation
KeywordsBiologyCell biologyEstrogen receptorEstrogenSignal transductionReceptorGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tumor suppressor serine-threonine kinase LKB1 is mutated in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) and in epithelial cancers, including hormone-sensitive organs such as breast, ovaries, testes, and prostate. Clinical studies in breast cancer patients show low LKB1 expression is related to poor prognosis, whereas in PJS, the risk of breast cancer is similar to the risk from germline mutations in breast cancer (BRCA) 1/BRCA2. In this study, we investigate the role of LKB1 in estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) signaling. We demonstrate for the first time that LKB1 binds to ERalpha in the cell nucleus in which it is recruited to the promoter of ERalpha-responsive genes. Furthermore, LKB1 catalytic activity enhances ERalpha transactivation compared with LKB1 catalytically deficient mutants. The significance of our discovery is that we demonstrate for the first time a novel functional link between LKB1 and ERalpha. Our discovery places LKB1 in a coactivator role for ERalpha signaling, broadening the scientific scope of this tumor suppressor kinase and laying the groundwork for the use of LKB1 as a target for the development of new therapies against breast cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Biology of the CellSame topicEstrogen and related hormone effectsFrench-language works237,207