MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062894095 · doi:10.1115/imece2004-61275

Asymptotic Impact Control of Hydraulic Actuators With Friction

2004· article· en· W2062894095 on OpenAlexaff
Pooya Sekhavat, Nariman Sepehri, Q. Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActuatorControl theory (sociology)Hydraulic cylinderNonlinear systemHydraulic machineryElectro-hydraulic actuatorLyapunov functionHydraulic motorPosition (finance)Motion controlInstabilityWork (physics)PlantSlip (aerodynamics)Lyapunov stabilityEngineeringComputer scienceControl (management)MechanicsMechanical engineeringRobotPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The focus of this work is stabilization of hydraulic actuators during the transition from free motion to constraint motion and regulating the intermediate impacts that could drive the system unstable. In our past research, we introduced Lyapunov-based nonlinear control schemes capable of fulfilling the above goal by resting the implement on the surface of the environment before starting the sustained-contact motion. The hydraulic actuator’s stick-slip friction effect was, however, either not included in the analysis or not compensated by the control action. In this paper, the application of our previously introduced friction compensating position control scheme is extended to impact regulation of a hydraulic actuator. Theoretical solution and stability analyses as well as actual experiments prove that such control scheme is also effective for asymptotic impact control (with no position steady-state error) of hydraulic actuators in the presence of actuator’s dry friction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207