MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062896134 · doi:10.1002/lite.200800022

Health benefits of omega‐3 fatty acids from Neptune krill oil

2008· article· en· W2062896134 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLipid Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsSafe Engineering Services & Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScrutinyPortfolioHealth foodKrillNeptuneBusinessEnvironmental scienceFisheryChemistryBiologyPolitical scienceFood sciencePhysicsPlanetFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Over the last few decades, natural health ingredients have gained the interest and support of both science and industry. The increasing incidence of adverse events associated with synthetic drugs has created a demand for effective and safe alternative treatments. The few natural health ingredients that have been rigorously researched for their safety and efficacy and have passed both peer and regulatory scrutiny can provide a solution to this problem. Neptune krill oil® (NKO®) fulfills these criteria by supporting solid scientifically validated research proving safety and efficacy. Furthermore, the company is involved in several novel clinical trials to further expand its proprietary and innovative portfolio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it