MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062938247 · doi:10.1117/12.776574

Thermal modeling of thermally isolated microplates

2008· article· en· W2062938247 on OpenAlexaff
Nezih Topaloğlu, Patricia Nieva, Mustafa Yavuz, Jan P. Huissoon

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTransition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobolometerMaterials scienceThermal conductivityThermal resistanceThermal contact conductanceThermalSubstrate (aquarium)Finite element methodScanning thermal microscopyHeat fluxConductancePixelComposite materialOpticsHeat transferMechanicsBolometerThermodynamicsCondensed matter physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we present an efficient method to calculate the thermal conductance in a thermally isolated microplate, connected to the substrate by two thin arms. The method can be applied to uncooled microbolometer pixels which in general, incorporate a thermally isolated microplate. The model approximates the microplate as a two-region slab, where heat flows in one direction. The thermal resistance that results from the constriction of the heat flux lines is added to the model as thermal contact resistance. To evaluate the model, two microplates having different dimensions were fabricated using PolyMUMPs. The experimental results are compared to the proposed model and finite element simulations. It is shown that for the tested structures, the maximum discrepancy in thermal conductance between our model and the experiments is 6%, compared to the ~22% discrepancy found using conventional models. It is concluded that the method is very effective in thermal modeling of microplates and it is applicable to uncooled microbolometer pixels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicTransition Metal Oxide NanomaterialsFrench-language works237,207