Spatial and dietary requirements of the chuditch (Dasyurus geoffroii) in a semiarid climatic zone
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Knowledge of the ecology of the chuditch (Dasyurus geoffroii) is largely restricted to its distribution in mesic jarrah forests. There is a need for information regarding its ecology in semiarid zones where rainfall and consequently productivity are lower than mesic forests. Given that spatial requirements are strongly influenced by resource availability, it was expected that the chuditch in the semiarid zone would be present at lower densities and would have larger core home ranges (defined by daytime refuges) than those in the jarrah forests. The diet was also investigated by examining the contents of scats. Chuditch at Forrestania were trapped and six individuals were radio-tracked. The population density was one-third that of the lowest estimate reported from the jarrah forest and core home-range estimates were substantially larger, particularly for males. The diet included mammals, birds, reptiles, invertebrates, plants and rubbish, which was consistent with it being a generalist predator. Chuditch did have greater spatial requirements than in the jarrah forest, therefore different management regimes may be needed for populations occurring in the semiarid zone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it