Directional source grouping for multi-agent itinerary planning in wireless sensor networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As software entities that migrate among nodes, mobile agents (MAs) are able to deliver and execute codes for flexible application re-tasking, local processing, and collaborative signal and information processing. In contrast to the conventional wireless sensor network operations based on the client-server computing model, recent research has shown the efficiency of agent-based data collection and aggregation in collaborative and ubiquitous environments. In this paper, we consider the problem of calculating multiple itineraries for MAs to visit source nodes in parallel. Our algorithm iteratively partitions a directional sector zone where the source nodes are included in an itinerary. The length of an itinerary is controlled by the angle of the directional sector zone in such a way that near-optimal routes for MAs can be obtained by selecting the angle efficiently in an adaptive fashion. Simulation results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm as well as its performance gain over alternative approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it