MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062984057 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.20143775

Petroleum Properties from Basin Modelling: Success Stories from Conventional and Unconventional Settings

2014· article· en· W2062984057 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rolando di Primio, Brian Horsfield

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleumStructural basinPetroleum engineeringSubmarine pipelineGeologyPetroleum systemPetroleum explorationDrillingEngineeringSource rockGeotechnical engineeringGeomorphologyMechanical engineeringPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The prediction of gas-oil ratios, phase state and petroleum quality ahead of drilling is a proven element of exploration in both conventional and unconventional petroleum systems. Here we show how our compositional kinetic approach (PhaseKinetics) has been successfully applied in the Jean d’Arc Basin offshore Canada, as well as in the Bakken Formation of the Williston Basin, USA. We demonstrate how cumulative and instantaneous fluid descriptions can be developed and applied in petroleum system modeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.662

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedingsSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207