MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062984125 · doi:10.1002/ar.20850

Presence of Galanin‐Like Immunoreactivity in Mesenchymal and Neural Crest Origin Tissues During Embryonic Development in the Mouse

2009· article· en· W2062984125 on OpenAlexaff
Melissa K. Jones, Paul Perumal, Maria Vrontakis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Anatomical Record · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalaninNeural crestMesenchymeBiologyMesodermNeuropeptideEmbryogenesisEmbryonic stem cellEmbryoNeural tubeCell biologyAnatomyInternal medicineEndocrinologyGeneticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Galanin is a highly conserved neuropeptide with a wide range of biological effects. Recently, through transcriptome analysis, galanin was identified in undifferentiated mouse embryonic stem cells as one of the most abundant transcripts. We have examined the developmental expression of galanin-like immunoreactivity in mice from embryonic day 10 (E10) to embryonic day 15 (E15). At E10, galanin was readily detected in the undifferentiated head and trunk mesenchyme of both mesodermal and neural crest origin. There was also strong immunoreactivity in the mesenchymal spiral ridges of the outflow tract of the heart and the endocardial cushions. The highest level of galanin detected was at E13 in the craniofacial mesenchyme and proliferating chondrocytes in bones of both neural crest and mesoderm origin. Dorsal root ganglia and trigeminal ganglia contained galanin immunoreactive cells as well. These data indicate the presence of galanin peptide during periods of morphogenesis and thus a developmental role for the peptide in mesenchymal and neural crest origin tissues in the mouse embryo. Whether galanin has a growth and/or differentiating role, still remains to be demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Anatomical RecordSame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207