MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062990017 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0527

Onward to the Olympics: Historical Perspectives on the Olympic Games (review)

2009· article· en· W2062990017 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Bruce Kidd

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSports, Gender, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreeksIdeologyScholarshipHistoryClassicsIdentity (music)State (computer science)SociologyPoliticsLawAestheticsPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Onward to the Olympics: Historical Perspectives on the Olympic Games Bruce Kidd (bio) Gerald P. Schaus and Stephen R. Wenn, editors. Onward to the Olympics: Historical Perspectives on the Olympic Games. Wilfrid Laurier University Press. xxvii, 376. $65.00 While the International Olympic Committee and many Greeks have long claimed continuity between ancient and modern Olympics, contending [End Page 342] that Pierre de Coubertin simply ‘revived’ the games after a break of some 1,500 years, the scholarship of the last forty emphatically rejects such claims of transhistorical identity. The differences between ancient and modern games and the societies that supported them far outnumber the similarities. The consensus is that Coubertin did not revive the games as he liked to claim but clothed a totally modern festival in the garb of antiquity for contemporary ideological reasons. This collection, the proceedings of a conference held during the buildup to the 2004 Olympics in Athens, where ancient and modern images were constantly intertwined, consciously seeks to address questions of comparison. Yet most of the papers contribute to and elaborate upon the consensus. The first, longest, and strongest section of the book deals with the origins of the ancient games, their ideals and practices, the place of women (largely absent), and several issues that have long fascinated students of classical athletics, such as how accurate were the lists of winners (not very), who were the judges (they were all drawn from Elis, the host city state), who were the losers (although the ancients had no equivalent to the silver medal, so that athletes prayed ‘for the wreath or death,’ the late Victor Matthews convincingly argues that there is more information available on the losers than was previously understood), and how did the athletes actually perform the long jump with halteres, the hand weights depicted in vase paintings of the event (Hugh Lee concludes from the recent scholarship that the jump began with a run). Many of the papers require knowledge of the classical scholarship to follow the argument in detail, but they are all well summarized for the general reader. Most helpful are two overviews by Nigel Crowther, who shows that none of the modern Coubertin ideals of peace and international understanding were associated with ancient games. On the contrary, the ancient games were never cancelled because of war, even with conflict raging a few hundred kilometres away, city states sought the advice of the seer at Olympia before going into battle, and successful armies offered their arms in thanksgiving to the temple of Zeus at Olympia, even if the victories were won at the expense of fellow Greeks. While the second section on the modern Olympics is more synthetic, with several discussions of what is now familiar scholarship, there are strong research papers on the origins of the Olympic torch relay (Robert Barney and Anthony Bijkerk argue that Carl Diem’s inspiration for the first relay in 1936 came from the installation of a caldron and flame in the Olympic Stadium in Amsterdam in 1928), the financial transformation of the International Olympic Committee under Juan Antonio Samaranch (by Wenn and Scott Martyn), and the politics of the forgotten Olympiad for the Physically Disabled in Toronto in 1976, one of the forerunners to the Paralympic Games (by [End Page 343] David Greig). The organizers of the Olympiad repeatedly refused to honour the international moratorium against apartheid sport, and went ahead and invited disabled athletes from South Africa, at the cost of federal financial support. Greig argues that the dispute, which he dismisses as ‘splitting hairs,’ enabled them to raise funds elsewhere, bringing the games much wider support than might have otherwise obtained. In a concluding essay, Mark Dyerson ponders the very future of the modern games, suggesting that, like world fairs, the original nineteenth-century attempt to bring the world together and one of Coubertin’s inspirations, the Olympics may soon be marginalized by global television and the growing popularity of extreme sports and Survivor formats. Tracking that trajectory, too, will require critical, historically grounded research, of which this collection is an important example. Bruce Kidd Bruce Kidd, Faculty of Physical Education and Health, University of Toronto Copyright © 2009 University of...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicSports, Gender, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207