Multiple Pathways for Dinitrogen Activation during the Reduction of an Fe Bis(iminepyridine) Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reduction of the bis(iminopyridine) FeCl(2) complex {2,6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))](2)(C(5)H(3)N)}FeCl(2) using NaH has led to the formation of a surprising variety of structures depending on the amount of reductant. Some of the species reported in this work were isolated from the same reaction mixture, and their structures suggest the presence of multiple pathways for dinitrogen activation. The reaction with 3 equiv of NaH afforded {2-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))]-6-[2,6-(iPr)(20PhN-C=CH(2)](C(5)H(3)N)}Fe(micro,eta(2)-N(2))Na (THF) (1) containing one N(2) unit terminally bound to Fe and side-on attached to the Na atom. In the process, one of the two imine methyl groups has been deprotonated, transforming the neutral ligand into the corresponding monoanionic version. When 4 equiv were employed, two other dinitrogen complexes {2-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))]-6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN-C=CH(2)](C(5)H(3)N)}Fe(micro-N2)Na(Et(2)O)(3) (2) and {2,6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))](2)(C(5)H(3)N)}Fe(micro-N(2))Na[Na(THF)(2)] (3) were obtained from the same reaction mixture. Complex 2 is chemically equivalent to 1, the different degree of solvation of the alkali cation being the factor apparently responsible for the sigma-bonding mode of ligation of the N(2) unit to Na, versus the pi-bonding mode featured in 1. In complex 3, the ligand remains neutral but a larger extent of reduction has been obtained, as indicated by the presence of two Na atoms in the structure. A further increase in the amount of reductant (12 equiv) afforded a mixture of {2-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))]-6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN-C=CH(2)](C(5)H(3)N)}Fe-N(2) (4) and [{2,6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))](2)(C(5)H(3)N)}Fe-N(2)](2)(micro-Na) [Na(THF)(2)](2) (5) which were isolated by fractional crystallization. Complex 4, also containing a terminally bonded N(2) unit and a deprotonated anionic ligand bearing no Na cations, appears to be the precursor of 1. The apparent contradiction that excess NaH is required for its successful isolation (4 is the least reduced complex of this series) is most likely explained by the formation of the partner product 5, which may tentatively be regarded as the result of aggregation between 1 and 3 (with the ligand system in its neutral form). Finally, reduction carried out in the presence of additional free ligand afforded {2,6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))](2)(C(5)H(3)N)}Fe(eta(1)-N(2)){2,6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))](20(NC(5)H(2))}[Na(THF)(2)] (6) and {2,6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))](2)(C(5)H(3)N)}Fe{2,6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))](2)(NC(5)H(2))}Na(THF)(2)) (7). In both species, the Fe metal is bonded to the pyridine ring para position of an additional (L)Na unit. Complex 6 chemically differs from 7 (the major component) only for the presence of an end-on coordinated N(2).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".