Vitamin D Status in Patients with Recurrent Kidney Stones
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data regarding the prevalence of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) insufficiency in patients with nephrolithiasis, and the effects of vitamin D supplementation on parathyroid hormone (PTH) are few and conflicting. In this article, we examined the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency in 236 recurrent kidney stone formers and the correlation of vitamin D levels with other parameters of stone formation. The prevalent stone composition was calcium oxalate (80.4%) and uric acid (16.45%). One third of stone formers had vitamin D insufficiency and a quarter of them high PTH levels (PTH >7.5 pmol/l) with normal serum (total and ionized) calcium values. Predictor of high PTH was low 25(OH)D level (r = 0.989, r(2) = 0.977, p < 0.001). Stone formers with hypercalciuria had higher 25(OH)D values (72.26 ± 4.21 vs. 59.29 ± 1.76, p = 0.0013) compared to stone formers with urine calcium within normal ranges. Further studies are needed in order to better define the consequences of vitamin D insufficiency and to evaluate the impact of the therapeutic interventions in this cohort.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it