Vitamin D Status in Patients with Recurrent Kidney Stones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data regarding the prevalence of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) insufficiency in patients with nephrolithiasis, and the effects of vitamin D supplementation on parathyroid hormone (PTH) are few and conflicting. In this article, we examined the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency in 236 recurrent kidney stone formers and the correlation of vitamin D levels with other parameters of stone formation. The prevalent stone composition was calcium oxalate (80.4%) and uric acid (16.45%). One third of stone formers had vitamin D insufficiency and a quarter of them high PTH levels (PTH >7.5 pmol/l) with normal serum (total and ionized) calcium values. Predictor of high PTH was low 25(OH)D level (r = 0.989, r(2) = 0.977, p < 0.001). Stone formers with hypercalciuria had higher 25(OH)D values (72.26 ± 4.21 vs. 59.29 ± 1.76, p = 0.0013) compared to stone formers with urine calcium within normal ranges. Further studies are needed in order to better define the consequences of vitamin D insufficiency and to evaluate the impact of the therapeutic interventions in this cohort.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".