Self-assembly using stannylplatinum(IV) halide complexes as ligands for organotin halides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The possibility of forming extended structures by self-association using transition metal halides as donors to organotin acceptors has been investigated. The stannylplatinum(IV) complex [PtClMe2(SnMe2Cl)(bu2bpy)] forms a 1:1 adduct [PtClMe2(SnMe2Cl)(bu2bpy)]·Me2SnCl2 with Me2SnCl2 in which the organoplatinum complex acts as a donor to the organotin halide. Similarly, [PtClMe2(SnMeCl2)(bu2bpy)] forms adducts [PtClMe2(SnMeCl2)(bu2bpy)]·MeSnCl3 or [PtClMe2(SnMeCl2)(bu2bpy)]·Me2SnCl2, and [{PtClMe2(bu2bpy)}2(µ-SnCl2)] forms [{PtClMe2(bu2bpy)}2(µ-SnCl2)]·Me2SnCl2. Structure determinations on selected compounds show that the donor is the Pt-Cl group and the acceptor tin centre is 5-coordinate. In the similar bromo complex [PtBrMe2(SnMeBr2)(bu2bpy)]·Me2SnBr2 both the Pt-Br and PtSn-Br groups coordinate to the Me2SnBr2 acceptor with short (3.14 or 3.29 Å) and long (3.99 or 4.05 Å) contacts, respectively, so that the acceptor tin centre adopts distorted octahedral stereochemistry in the solid state and a folded polymeric structure is formed. Reaction of [{PtClMe2(bu2bpy)}2(µ-SnCl2)] with AgO3SCF3 yields the complex [{PtClMe2(bu2bpy)}(µ-SnCl2){PtMe2(bu2bpy)O3SCF3}], which is fluxional in solution.Key words: platinum, tin, self-assembly, coordination chemistry, organometallics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".