Sex Differences in Prodromal Symptoms of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pilot Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that there are sex/gender differences in the presentation and prodromal symptoms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The purpose of this pilot study was to identify sex differences in the prodromal symptoms of ACS using the McSweeney Acute and Prodromal Myocardial Infarction Symptom Survey (MAPMISS). Telephone surveys using the MAPMISS were conducted between 4 and 6 months after the ACS event. Seventy-six patients (24 women) participated in the study. The women generally reported higher prodromal scores. Moreover, scores demonstrated differences in prodromal symptoms based on menopausal status. The premenopausal and perimenopausal women reported a greater number and higher frequency of symptoms compared with the men and menopausal women. The results of this study suggest that both men and women report nontraditional prodromal symptoms of ACS. In addition, there appears to be a difference in the frequency and number of symptoms reported based on menopausal status.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".