MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063059429 · doi:10.1049/ip-com:20010633

RAKE receiver using blind adaptive minimum output energy detection for DS/CDMA over multipath fading channels

2001· article· en· W2063059429 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Weng, Tho Le‐Ngoc

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Communications · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingRake receiverMultipath propagationRakeComputer scienceCode division multiple accessSpread spectrumDelay spreadMultiuser detectionDetectorAlgorithmElectronic engineeringChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To achieve better tracking of time-varying channel parameters, a structure using blind adaptive minimum output energy (MOE) detection in conjunction with RAKE combining diversity for direct-sequence code-division multiple-access communications over frequency selective multipath fading channels is introduced. In this MOE-RAKE structure, the signal replicas received from multiple fading paths are first independently produced by a bank of adaptive MOE detectors and then combined by a RAKE receiver for final symbol decision. A normalised, complex-valued stochastic gradient descent algorithm is developed for the blind adaptation used in the MOE-RAKE. Simulation results show that, in the time-invariant channel, the MOE-RAKE has a performance comparable to the previously proposed MOE and outperforms the conventional RAKE. In the time-varying channel, the MOE-RAKE performs better than the other blind multiuser detection techniques. In practice, to further improve the detector performance, a hybrid scheme started with blind adaptation for the initial updates and then switched to the decision-directed algorithm is desired.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEE Proceedings - CommunicationsSame topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207