Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au chapitre du contrat de société et d'association l'Avant-projet n'entend pas modifier fondamentalement les institutions. Il se contente souvent de clarifier les droits des parties. Cet effort est louable et l'exercice est souvent réussi. L'Avant-projet est aussi généralement satisfaisant sur des points importants comme l'élimination de la distinction entre sociétés civiles et sociétés commerciales, même si le contenu juridique du nouveau concept d'entreprise reste à préciser. L'Avant-projet s'est attaqué aux définitions mêmes des sociétés et des associations. Les définitions proposées à l'article 2250 sont ambiguës et vont à l'encontre des définitions retenues aux articles 326 et 327 du Code. Sur ce point l'échec est total et compromet l'ensemble de la réforme. Une innovation mineure mais significative est signalée. Les articles 2270 et 2290 prévoient un mécanisme pour le règlement des différends sur l'évaluation des parts sociales. La nature de cette technique, expertise ou arbitrage, n'est cependant pas claire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".