MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063069681 · doi:10.1016/s1081-602x(03)00006-x

Family, farm, and factory: Labor and the family in the transition from protoindustry to factory industry in 19th-century Twente, the Netherlands

2003· article· en· W2063069681 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
François Hendrickx

Bibliographic record

VenueThe History of the Family · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureQuarter (Canadian coin)Factory (object-oriented programming)Division of labourGeographyDemographic economicsDemographySociologyPolitical scienceEconomicsLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, sex and class-specific career paths in two 19th-century Dutch communities are investigated. The neighboring communities were both heavily involved in protoindustrial cotton production during the first half of the 19th century, whereas during the second half, one of the communities (Borne) became fully industrialized while the other (Wierden) hardly industrialized, and instead began to develop commercial agriculture. For both of these periods in both communities marriage cohorts were reconstituted, leading to a total of four reconstitutions. Based on data from marriage certificates in both communities, three occupational categories can be distinguished: those involved in agriculture, textiles, and other occupations. For all heads of households in each of these groups—and for their wives, whenever possible—life courses were reconstructed from the following data available in the civil registers: births and deaths of the children (if they died before reaching age 15) and deaths of spouses. A change of occupational category was not uncommon: Over one quarter of all heads of households made such a change at least once in their lifetimes. For women, this proportion was less certain, but clearly, it was not unusual for them to change occupational categories as well. Most changes were from the textiles to the agriculture category. At age 20–25 years, roughly a 40–40–20 division existed between agriculture, textiles, and other occupations; by age 65, that division had become roughly 80–0–20. Almost all men who started their careers in textiles shifted to agriculture over the course of their lives. Changes from agriculture to textiles were rare, whereas men working in the “other occupations” category (mostly small business, handcrafts, and services) hardly ever changed categories. This was true for both communities and both protoindustrial and industrial periods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe History of the FamilySame topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207