MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063074730 · doi:10.1115/fedsm-icnmm2010-30279

Linear Stability of a Thin Liquid Film Flowing Along an Inclined Surface

2010· article· en· W2063074730 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoxia Hu, Ali Dolatabadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Thin Films
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurface tensionMaterials scienceThin filmSubstrate (aquarium)Boundary value problemMechanicsStability (learning theory)OpticsSolid surfaceShear (geology)Surface waveIcingThermodynamicsComposite materialPhysicsMeteorologyMathematicsNanotechnologyGeologyComputer scienceChemical physicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The formation of the waves on a thin liquid water film was analytically investigated by studying its shear mode stability. The inclined angle of the substrate is limited to 8°. The purpose of analytical solution is to determine the maximum growth rate of the generated wave as well as its corresponding wave number, which is realized by solving the Orr-Sommerfeld equations for both gas and liquid phases with the corresponding boundary conditions. The results of wave formations on a surface with a thin liquid film of de-icing are validated by previous experimental data as well as compared with Yih’s theoretical analysis [7]. Studies have also conducted on the effect of surface tension or liquid film depth on the stability of a thin liquid film flowing along a solid substrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFluid Dynamics and Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207