MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063102060 · doi:10.1080/17449855.2014.904245

Refugees and global violence: complicity in Rawi Hage’s <i>Cockroach</i>

2014· article· en· W2063102060 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Postcolonial Writing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComplicityNarrativeContext (archaeology)RefugeeCriticismFace (sociological concept)HarmSociologyAestheticsHistoryGender studiesCriminologyPolitical scienceLiteratureLawPhilosophySocial scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since its publication in 2008, Rawi Hage’s Cockroach has generated two forms of criticism, one which focuses on Hage’s unnamed narrator’s experiences in Montreal, and another which pays attention to his diasporic condition and trauma complex. Both critical methodologies face specific conceptual challenges, as neither can reconcile the national and local context of Cockroach with its global and diasporic affiliations. For that reason, this article connects these two methodologies by analysing the function of refugee narratives in Cockroach. This article interprets the narrator as complicit with those he criticizes and reads the novel’s violent ending as a duplication of western modes of intervention through narratives of security and rescue rather than as a tool that allows the protagonist to overcome his guilt complex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it