MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2063105935 · doi:10.2118/163910-ms

Coiled-Tubing Jet Cutting Multiple Stage Fracture Treating Improves Fracture Treatment Techniques to Unlock Bypassed Reserves in Cotton Valley Sands, Dorcheat Macedonia Field, Magnolia Arkansas

2013· article· en· W2063105935 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. W. Pomrenke, Jim Strain, Robert J. Davis, Chuck Bell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFracture (geology)GeologyGeotechnical engineeringStage (stratigraphy)Hydraulic fracturingOil sandsPetroleum engineeringEnvironmental scienceMining engineeringMaterials scienceComposite materialAsphalt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Coil Tubing Jet Cutting-Multiple Stage Fracture Treating in SW Arkansas Lower Cotton Valley Sands is the key to economic development of previously bypassed reserves in layered Cotton Valley reservoir. Changes from previous hydraulic fracture treatments are categorized as follows: (1) focus fracture coverage per stage by sand jet cutting each stage with treatment fluids pumped via coil tubing and using sand plugs or packer assembly for zonal isolation between stages, (2) annular fracture treatments using reduced pump rates to limit fracture height growth, (3) proppant with higher strength and conductivity, and (4) environmental friendly chemicals to enhance flow back and increase oil production. Bonanza Creek Energy, due to increased environmental considerations, changed to an environmental friendly fluid system. Substitutions which provide improved environmental chemistry, while supporting formation stability of clay, offer reduced environmental risk eliminating conventional polymeric chemistry. Recovery of fracture treatment fluids approach 30% of treatment volumes. The fracture fluid is a cross-linked 30# system, borate guar, loaded with optimized breaker schedule and enhanced surfactants. The high viscosity allows for adequate fracture width generation for placement of preferred 16/30 proppant at low pump rates. The past hydraulic fracture treatments of the Lower Cotton Valley Sands separated the 500 ft gross Cotton Valley/Haynesville interval into two (2) treatment stages with limited entry perforating of sands in each stage Fracture treatments in 2007 typically used 150,000# of 20/40 Ottawa Sand per stage pumped at 30-50 BPM down the casing. Tracer surveys and production logging have shown that these treatments were not effective in treating all the reservoir layers of sand. The new method of fracture treatment has unlocked previously bypassed reserves. Credit for the higher initial flow rates and ultimate recoveries are estimated to be 70% due the contributions of coil cutting technology, 20% due the improved proppant strength and conductivity and 10% due the improvements in the fluid system. One hundred six (106) wells have been drilled and stimulated using the new method of fracturing and 100+ wells are in inventory at 10-acre spacing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→