L’analyse politique critique au Canada anglais et la question du Québec, 1970-1993
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il y aurait beaucoup à dire sur les théories élaborées au Canada anglais sur les réalités québécoises depuis le XIX e siècle. Nous verrons de quelle façon le nationalisme québécois et ses revendications constitutionnelles ont été analysées dans les universités canadiennes, durant les vingt-cinq dernières années. Il est possible de retracer chronologiquement l’hégémonie de quelques grands paradigmes théoriques, qui se suivent selon des enchaînements à la fois de filiation et de rupture. L’attachement aux institutions étatiques tend pourtant à apparaître comme une constante desdits paradigmes, conditionnant dans certains cas la perception des phénomènes circonscrits et, ce qui devient paradoxal, la définition démocratique même des rapports entre populations et... institutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".