Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report 3 representative cases of soft tissue filler identified in locations other than their intended injected sites (possible migration) and review the literature on pathogenesis of filler migration. INTRODUCTION: Soft tissue fillers are continuing to increase in popularity throughout North America and worldwide as a means of volume restoration and contour enhancement. With increasing recognition of their value in restoring a more youthful appearance and the ease of office injection, soft tissue fillers have become one of the most commonly performed nonsurgical cosmetic procedures. Soft tissue fillers are also foreign bodies in our system and therefore have the potential for a myriad of complications both immediately after the injection and potentially months or years later. Filler migration is one such complication and has a number of potential mechanisms. METHODS: The authors reviewed the medical records of 3 patients with filler located in areas other than their intended injected sites possibly as a result of migration. All patients were from the practice of 1 individual (DRJ). A MEDLINE search of the English-language literature on filler migration was conducted to investigate the various causes responsible for migration of filler. RESULTS: Clinical manifestations of the possible filler migration in the 3 cases included eyelid swelling in 2 patients and a noninflammatory mass adjacent to the area of filler injection in the third patient. Surgery was performed on 1 patient, and filler was visualized in the tissue and dissolved with hyaluronidase. Hyaluronidase was also used to dissolve the suspected filler in a second patient, and the third patient has elected to continue with observation. CONCLUSIONS: Filler migration is one of the potential complications associated with the injection of soft tissue fillers. It is important all physicians assessing nodules/masses/swelling in the facial area be aware that soft tissue fillers may migrate to a location away from their intended site of injection by several mechanisms and persist in the tissue even years later. A delayed reaction to the filler may occur months to years later and at times subject the patient to unnecessary investigations in attempt to identify it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it