MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063194440 · doi:10.1002/cjce.20111

Henry's law constant for hydrogen in high temperature water with dissolved lithium and boron

2008· article· en· W2063194440 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Franck Giraudeau, D. H. Lister, David R. Morris, Uncharat Setthanan, Frank R. Steward, Lei Tai Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoronHydrogenLithium (medication)Henry's lawThermodynamicsChemistryConstant (computer programming)Inorganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceAqueous solutionPhysical chemistryPhysicsEnvironmental chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The results of measurement of the Henry's law constant are reported for solutions of H2 in H2O, with dissolved lithium and boron, at high temperature (220 to ∼300°C). The experimental procedure involved the use of a palladium/hydrogen electrical resistance sensor to determine the hydrogen gas pressure in equilibrium with the hydrogen dissolved in the water. Values of $K_{\rm H}^\infty$ for the above solutions were lower than values for the solute‐free H2/H2O solutions. For conditions typical of a Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) the lowering amounted to about 3%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.158
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207