Bibliographic record
Abstract
En se basant sur l’exemple des actions de sensibilisation aux questions d’éthique menées dans le cadre de la formation initiale des futurs hauts fonctionnaires français, cet article traite de l’intérêt qu’il y a à se référer aux vertus civiques telles qu’elles ont pu être conceptualisées dans l’Antiquité et à la Renaissance pour guider l’action publique en général et le comportement à la fois collectif et individuel de ses agents face aux défis que rencontre l’administration publique moderne. Toutefois, la présence de ces vertus ne pouvant pas toujours être considérée comme acquise, il convient de faire en sorte que les valeurs auxquelles elles renvoient soient transmises et qu’elles soient mises en avant dans la formation des futurs cadres de l’administration publique pour pouvoir être mises en pratique dans l’exercice de leurs fonctions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".