MODIFICATIONS IN CCKB RECEPTORS, MAPKINASE ACTIVITIES AND PARP ACTIVATION IN THREE MODELS OF INDUCED PANCREATITIS.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Pancreatitis results in partial destruction of the pancreatic gland through apoptosis and/or necrosis. In most pancreatitis models, regeneration of the gland occurs with time. In this study, our aim was to document the apoptosis phenomenon, the behavior of the CCKB receptor subtype and the timing of the regeneration processes following pancreatitis induction in the rat. Methods: Interstitial pancreatitis was induced either by cerulein in gelatin sc every 8h for 48h at 12μg kg−1(IP12) or by cerulein sc at 100μg kg−1 + 4 injection hourly at 50μg kg−1(IP100). Necrotizing pancreatitis resulted following a single i.p. arginine injection in water at 4.5g kg−1(AP). Rats were killed 1, 2 4, 8, 12, 16, 24 and 48h after the 1st injection. Pancreas were weighed, homogenized to measure poly ADP robose polymerase (PARP), an apoptosis marker, CCKB receptor proteins and perk as a regeneration marker. Results: Activated PARP was observed in the three models of induced pancreatitis. In the IP12 model, increases started at 8h to reach maximal values at 48h. In the IP100 model, increases started at 12h to peak at 48h whereas in the AP model, peak activations occurred at 16 and 48h. In IP12, CCKBR/NaKATPase ratios significantly decreased at 1h recovered control (C) values at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16h to be reduced again at 24 and 48h. In IP100, ratios were increased at 1h, decreased at 2h, C values at 4h, reached maximal values at 8h and were significantly decreased at 16, 24 and 48h. In AP, ratios were significantly decreased at 1, 4 and 48h but remained at C values at 2, 8, 12, 16 and 24h. With regards to perk/MAPK ratios, higher values were observed at 2h in IP12 and at 4h in IP100. In AP, significant increases were observed at 4, 12 and 16h with a significant decrease at 48h. Conclusions: The three models of pancreatitis exhibited activation of apoptotic processes at different time periods. The CCKB receptors protein expression was generally repressed in the course of pancreatitis development in the three models. Bursts of regeneration as established by ERK phosphorylation were also observed in the three models with a more sustained activation in the AP group. Supported by NSERC Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".