MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063272525 · doi:10.1139/w00-069

A physical and genetic map of the<i>Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae</i>strain J genome

2000· article· en· W2063272525 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Walter Blank, G. W. Stemke

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMicrobial infections and disease research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCosmidContigBiologyMycoplasma hyopneumoniaePulsed-field gel electrophoresisGenomeGeneticsGenome sizeRestriction mapRestriction fragment length polymorphismStrain (injury)Polymerase chain reactionDNAGenotypePlasmidGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A macrorestriction map of the genome of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strain J, the type strain of the causative agent of enzootic pneumonia in pigs, was constructed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and DNA hybridization. The size of the genome as determined by PFGE was approximately 1070 kb. Assembly of the M. hyopneumoniae genomic map was facilitated and complimented by the simultaneous construction of an ordered cosmid library. Five contigs of overlapping cosmids were assembled, which together represent coverage of approximately 728 kb. Forty-two genetic markers (including three types of repeated elements) were placed on the M. hyopneumoniae map. Closer examination of an ApaI restriction fragment contained entirely within a single cosmid insert suggests that the genome size may be overestimated by PFGE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicMicrobial infections and disease researchFrench-language works237,207