MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063276354 · doi:10.1101/pdb.prot5019

High-Resolution Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization of <i>Drosophila</i> Embryos and Tissues: Figure 1.

2008· article· en· W2063276354 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCold Spring Harbor Protocols · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsIn situ hybridizationDrosophila (subgenus)In situEmbryoFluorescenceHigh resolutionBiologyCell biologyMolecular biologyChemistryGeneticsGenePhysicsRemote sensingGene expressionOpticsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTIONFluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is commonly used to analyze the three-dimensional distribution of RNAs in intact embryos and tissues. Tyramide signal amplification (TSA) significantly increases the sensitivity and resolution of FISH probe signals. This protocol includes optimized TSA-FISH procedures for Drosophila embryos, ovaries, and larval tissues. Instructions are given for the preparation of RNA probes, the collection and fixation of tissues, and the hybridization and TSA-mediated detection of probes, including options for high-throughput processing in 96-well plates. Variations of the procedure for RNA-RNA and RNA-protein costaining are also described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it