MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063282849 · doi:10.1080/09638280701189960

Towards a biopsychosocial framework of osteoarthritis of the knee

2007· article· en· W2063282849 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDisability and Rehabilitation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiopsychosocial modelPsychosocialOsteoarthritisPhysical therapyMedicineLimitingDiseasePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyAlternative medicinePsychotherapistPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research into the causes of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee has traditionally followed a biomedical approach whereby the disease development and progression is regarded as an internal physiological process. As a result, treatment has focused on symptom reduction with limited modification of psychosocial variables. In fact, psychosocial factors such as environment and employment play a substantial role in the disease process and are important determinants of the overall level of disability of affected individuals. Thus, by placing greater importance on the biomedical aspects of knee OA, a complete representation of the health condition cannot be achieved thereby limiting treatment effectiveness. The purpose of this clinical commentary is to provide a rationale for the implementation of a biopsychosocial model of knee OA that can aid in more effective research and treatment for the disorder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it