Centrosome biogenesis continues in the absence of microtubules during prolonged S‐phase arrest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When CHO cells are arrested in S-phase, they undergo repeated rounds of centrosome duplication without cell-cycle progression. While the increase is slow and asynchronous, the number of centrosomes in these cells does rise with time. To investigate mechanisms controlling this duplication, we have arrested CHO cells in S-phase for up to 72 h, and coordinately inhibited new centriole formation by treatment with the microtubule poison colcemid. We find that in such cells, the pre-existing centrosomes remain, and a variable number of foci--containing alpha/gamma-tubulin and centrin 2--assemble at the nuclear periphery. When the colcemid is washed out, the nuclear-associated foci disappear, and cells assemble new centriole-containing centrosomes, which accumulate the centriole scaffold protein SAS-6, nucleate microtubule asters, and form functional mitotic spindle poles. The number of centrosomes that assemble following colcemid washout increases with duration of S-phase arrest, even though the number of nuclear-associated foci or pre-existing centrosomes does not increase. This suggests that during S-phase, a cryptic generative event occurs repeatedly, even in the absence of new triplet microtubule assembly. When triplet microtubule assembly is restored, these cryptic generative events become realized, and multiple centriole-containing centrosomes assemble.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".