MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063332764 · doi:10.1542/peds.108.3.647

Respiratory Instability of Term and Near-Term Healthy Newborn Infants in Car Safety Seats

2001· article· en· W2063332764 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer R. Merchant, Cathy Worwa, Sharon Porter, John M. Coleman, Raye-Ann deRegnier

Bibliographic record

VenuePEDIATRICS · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSupine positionGestational agePediatricsCar seatApneaBradycardiaGestationOxygen saturationPulse oximetryHeart rateObstetricsAnesthesiaPregnancyBlood pressureInternal medicineOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Premature infants who are discharged from intensive care nurseries are known to be at increased risk for apnea, bradycardia, and oxygen desaturation while in the upright position. These small infants also do not fit securely in standard infant car seats. Because of these problems, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a period of observation in a car seat for all infants who are born at <37 weeks' gestation. It is not clear whether this recommendation should apply to the minimally preterm infants (born at 35-36 weeks' gestation) who are healthy at birth and are hospitalized in the normal newborn nursery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the respiratory stability and safety requirements of healthy, minimally preterm infants in car seats compared with term infants. METHODS: Fifty healthy, nonmonitored, preterm infants (mean gestational age: 35.8 +/- 0.6 weeks) and 50 term infants (mean gestational age: 39.5 +/- 1.4 weeks) were recruited from a level I newborn nursery in a community hospital. Appropriateness of car seat fit was documented for each infant. Heart rate, respiratory rate, and pulse oximetry were evaluated while infants were supine and in their car seats. Apneic and bradycardic events were recorded in addition to a continuous recording of oxygen saturation values. RESULTS: Twenty-four percent of preterm and 4% of term newborn infants did not fit securely into suitable car seats despite the use of blanket rolls. Mean oxygen saturation values declined significantly in both preterm and term infants from 97% in the supine position (range: 92%-100%) to 94% after 60 minutes in their car seats (range: 87%-100%). Seven infants (3 preterm and 4 term) had oxygen saturation values of <90% for longer than 20 minutes in their car seats. Twelve percent of the preterm infants (95% confidence interval: 4.5%-24.3%) but no term infants had apneic or bradycardic events in their car seats. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the current American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations that all infants who are born at <37 weeks' gestation, including those who are admitted to level I community hospitals, be observed for respiratory instability and secure fit in their car seats before hospital discharge. Because lowering of oxygen saturation values was seen uniformly in all newborn infants, car seats should be used only for travel, and travel should be minimized during the first months of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations99
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePEDIATRICSSame topicAutomotive and Human Injury BiomechanicsFrench-language works237,207