MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063358157 · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2005.05.067

Ceramide‐1‐phosphate promotes cell survival through activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase/protein kinase B pathway

2005· article· en· W2063358157 on OpenAlexaff
Antonio Gómez‐Muñoz, Jennifer Y. Kong, Ken Kuljit S. Parhar, Shih Wei Wang, Patricia Gangoiti, Monika González-Lopez, Sharlene Eivemark, B Salh, Vincent Duronio, Urs P. Steinbrecher

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCeramidePhosphatidylinositolKinaseCell biologyProtein kinase BLipid signalingSignal transductionPhosphorylationBiologyCell growthProtein kinase AApoptosisChemistryBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this report, we show for the first time that ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P) stimulates the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K)/protein kinase B (PKB) pathway, which is a major mechanism whereby growth factors promote cell survival. Also, C1P induced IkappaB phosphorylation, and enhanced the DNA binding activity of the transcription factor NF-kappaB. Apoptotic macrophages showed a marked reduction of Bcl-X(L) levels, and this was prevented by C1P. These findings suggest that C1P blocks apoptosis, at least in part, by stimulating the PI3-K/PKB/NF-kappaB pathway and maintaining the production of antiapoptotic Bcl-X(L). Based on these and our previous observations, we propose a working model for C1P in which inhibition of acid sphingomyelinase and the subsequent decrease in ceramide levels would allow cell signaling through stimulation of the PI3-K/PKB pathway to promote cell survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations156
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicSphingolipid Metabolism and SignalingFrench-language works237,207